Fetomaternal Outcome of Intracervical Catheterization as a Method of Induction of Labour at Term in Pregnant Women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1661Keywords:
Foley Catheter, Labour Induction, Fetomaternal Outcomes, NICU AdmissionAbstract
Background: Mechanical induction of labor using an intracervical Foley catheter remains a widely adopted strategy, particularly in low-resource settings. While it is considered effective for cervical ripening, its impact on fetomaternal outcomes varies across populations and clinical contexts. Understanding the pattern of associated complications can inform safer obstetric practice. Objective: To determine the frequency of fetomaternal outcome in patients with intracervical catheterization as a method of induction of labour. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: Conducted from October 2024 to April 2025 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. Methodology: A total of 100 pregnant women aged 18–35 years with singleton cephalic pregnancies beyond 37 weeks and a Bishop score <6 were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Labour was induced using an 18 French Foley catheter, with continuous traction and regular monitoring until expulsion. Maternal outcomes assessed included chorioamnionitis and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH); neonatal outcomes included NICU admission, low Apgar score, and meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). Results: The mean age of participants was 29.21 ± 3.29 years, with a mean gestational age of 39.54 ± 1.09 weeks and mean BMI of 25.74 ± 2.43 kg/m². Chorioamnionitis occurred in 12.0% of cases, PPH in 20.0%, NICU admission in 35.0%, low Apgar scores in 25.0%, and MAS in 19.0%. NICU admissions were significantly higher among women aged ≤30 years (42.2% vs. 22.2%, p=0.045), and low Apgar scores were significantly more frequent in rural residents compared to urban (36.2% vs. 15.1%, p=0.015). Conclusion: Intracervical Foley catheterization is a viable induction method, though certain complications such as NICU admissions and low Apgar scores are more common in specific demographic groups.
Downloads
References
Rattanakanokchai, S., Gallos, I. D., Kietpeerakool, C., Eamudomkarn, N., Alfirevic, Z., Oladapo, O. T., Chou, D., Mol, B. W., Li, W., Lumbiganon, P., Coomarasamy, A., & Price, M. J. (2023). Methods of induction of labour: A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023(1).
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd015234
Magee, L. A., Kirkham, K., Tohill, S., Gkini, E., Moakes, C. A., Dorling, J., Green, M., Hutcheon, J. A., Javed, M., Kigozi, J., Mol, B. W., Singer, J., Hardy, P., Stubbs, C., Thornton, J. G., & Von Dadelszen, P. (2024). Determining optimal timing of birth for women with chronic or gestational hypertension at term: The WILL (When to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension) randomised trial. PLOS Medicine, 21(11), e1004481.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004481
Swift, E. M., Gunnarsdottir, J., Zoega, H., Bjarnadottir, R. I., Steingrimsdottir, T., & Einarsdottir, K. (2022). Trends in labor induction indications: A 20‐year population‐based study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 101(12), 1422-1430.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14447
Middleton, P., Shepherd, E., & Crowther, C. A. (2018). Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004945.pub4
Zhao, G., Song, G., & Liu, J. (2022). Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04988-2
Socha, M. W., Flis, W., Pietrus, M., & Wartęga, M. (2023). Results of induction of labor with prostaglandins E1 and E2 (The RIPE study): A real-world data analysis of obstetrical effectiveness and clinical outcomes of pharmacological induction of labor with vaginal inserts. Pharmaceuticals, 16(7), 982.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16070982
De Vaan, M. D., Ten Eikelder, M. L., Jozwiak, M., Palmer, K. R., Davies-Tuck, M., Bloemenkamp, K. W., Mol, B. W., & Boulvain, M. (2019). Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(10).
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub3
Kuba, K., Kirby, M., Hughes, F., & Yellon, S. (2023). Reassessing the bishop score in clinical practice for induction of labor leading to vaginal delivery and for evaluation of cervix ripening. Placenta and Reproductive Medicine, 2.
https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2023.0353
Sangram Singh, B., Joshi, K., & Pajai, S. (2023). Intra-cervical Foley balloon catheter versus prostaglandins for the induction of labour: A literature review. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33855
Dsouza, Q. S., Sasidharan, S. E., Dsouza, T., Ambusaidi, Q., & Monteiro, A. D. (2025). Effectiveness of Intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in women with Singleton term pregnancy and previous lower segment cesarean section: A pilot study. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78404
Abdi, N., Alavi, A., Pakbaz, F., & Darabi, H. (2021). Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04011-0
Lukanović, D., Batkoska, M., Kavšek, G., & Druškovič, M. (2023). Clinical chorioamnionitis: Where do we stand now? Frontiers in Medicine, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1191254
Stock, S. J., Bhide, A., Richardson, H., Black, M., Yuill, C., Harkness, M., Reid, M., Wee, F., Cheyne, H., McCourt, C., Rana, D., Boyd, K. A., Sanders, J., Heera, N., Huddleston, J., Denison, F., Pasupathy, D., Modi, N., Smith, G., … Norrie, J. (2021). Cervical ripening at home or in-hospital—prospective cohort study and process evaluation (CHOICE) study: A protocol. BMJ Open, 11(5), e050452.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050452
Li, S., Ju, H., & Feng, C. (2024). Effect of cervical bishop score on induction of labor at term in primiparas using Foley catheter balloon: A retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06600-1
Ugwuoroko, H. C., Eleje, G. U., Okafor, C. G., Okechukwu, Z. C., Eke, A. C., Okoro, C. C., Okafor, L. U., Okafor, C. C., Ogabido, C. A., Njoku, T. K., Onyejiaka, C. C., Egwim, A. V., Obiagwu, H. I., Mamah, J. E., Olisa, C. L., Onah, N. L., & Udigwe, G. O. (2023). Obstetric outcome of induction of labour in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria: A five-year retrospective cross-sectional study. International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, 8(07), 235-240.
https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706
Deshmukh, V. L., Yelikar, K. A., & Deshmukh, A. B. (2011). Comparative study of intra-cervical Foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for pre-induction ripening (Cervical). The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 61(4), 418-421.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0063-2
Alam, A., & Ahmed, E. (2016). A comparative study of intra-cervical Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel for pre-induction cervical ripening. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2644-2647.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162637
Doly, F. A., Sadeka Tamanna, K. M., Rouf, P. S., Begum, P. A., Mahmood, F., Razeeb, M. R., Swarna, S. S., & Mahmud, I. (2023). Role of Intracervical catheterization for induction of labour in case of intrauterine Featal death with history of previous caesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 06(04).
https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr0146
Manasa, M. R, Kumar, S. G, Nair, A. (2024). Assessment of fetomaternal outcome following common induction methods (Foley’s catheter, dinoprostone and misoprostol) for induction of labor in low risk women with term pregnancy. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(1), 146-151.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20243941
Lawani, O. L., Onyebuchi, A. K., Iyoke, C. A., Okafo, C. N., & Ajah, L. O. (2014). Obstetric outcome and significance of labour induction in a health resource poor setting. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2014, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/419621
Bhatu, J. J., & Patel, D. (2020). Induction of labour after 37 weeks of pregnancy using Foley’s catheter: Traction versus non-traction method. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10(1), 275.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
