Effect of Dual Modality of Presenting Information on Students' Achievement in a Science Unit

Authors

  • Shabana Hameed Syed PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i4.1955

Keywords:

Dual Modality, Cognitive Load Theory, Science Achievement, Visual-Auditory Learning, Experimental Study, Modality Effect

Abstract

This experimental study investigated the effect of dual modality of presenting information using both visual and auditory modes on students’ academic achievement in General Science at the pre 9th grade. Grounded in John Sweller’s Cognitive Load Theory, the study tested the hypothesis that students taught through dual modality would outperform those taught through a single modality. The sample comprised 36 female students from FG Public School (Girls), Lalazar, Rawalpindi, divided into experimental and control groups based on matched pretest scores. The experimental group received instruction through visual and auditory materials (e.g., diagrams, models, PowerPoint presentations), while the control group was taught using a lecture-based, single-mode approach. Data were collected through pretest and posttest instruments and analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and independent samples t-test at a 0.05 significance level. Results revealed a statistically significant difference in posttest achievement scores in favor of the experimental group (t = 3.138, p < 0.05), confirming that dual modality instruction enhances learning outcomes and retention. The findings support the modality effect proposed by Cognitive Load Theory, suggesting that integrating visual and auditory channels reduces cognitive overload and improves conceptual understanding. It is recommended that science teachers employ dual modality presentations to promote deeper learning and engagement among students.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

Shabana Hameed Syed. (2025). Effect of Dual Modality of Presenting Information on Students’ Achievement in a Science Unit. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i4.1955