Maternal and Fetal outcomes in Premature Rupture of Membranes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.1797Keywords:
Maternal and fetal outcomes, Premature Rupture of Membranes, PROM, PROM-to-Delivery interval, Infection markers, Neonatal complications, Maternal complicationsAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes associated with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM), with a focus on identifying clinical and laboratory factors that contribute to adverse outcomes. The goal was to determine the impact of PROM-to-delivery interval, infection markers, and delivery mode on neonatal and maternal complications. Methodology: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women (PUMHSW), Nawabshah, over six months (November 02, 2023 to May 01, 2024). A total of 50 women with confirmed term PROM were enrolled using non-probability purposive sampling. The Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation with spontaneous rupture of membranes before the onset of labor. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, known fetal anomalies, and preterm PROM. Data was collected using a structured proforma and analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to explore trends and test associations between variables, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 28.36 ± 4.59 years, with most being multigravida. The average gestational age was 38.86 weeks. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 76% of cases, while cesarean section was performed in 24%, primarily due to fetal distress. A prolonged PROM-to-delivery interval (>18 hours) was significantly associated with maternal complications, including chorioamnionitis (30%) and postpartum endometritis (48%) (p<0.05), as well as neonatal sepsis (64%) and stillbirth (22%). CRP positivity (26%) and leukocytosis (36%) were strong predictors of infectious morbidity. Discolored liquor was significantly associated with fetal distress and NICU admissions. Statistical analysis revealed PROM duration, positive inflammatory markers, and abnormal liquor as significant predictors of adverse outcomes (p<0.05). Conclusion: PROM, even at term, presents a substantial risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity when not managed promptly. The findings underscore the importance of early hospital presentation, timely induction of labor, and routine screening for infection using CRP and leukocyte count. Public health initiatives should focus on educating pregnant women about the signs and risks of PROM. Institutional protocols must be strengthened to standardize the management of PROM, particularly in low-resource settings. Further multi-center research with larger sample sizes is needed to explore microbiological factors, optimize intervention timing, and reduce preventable maternal and neonatal complications.
Downloads
References
Kuba, K., & Bernstein, P. S. (2018). ACOG practice bulletin No. 188: Prelabor rupture of membranes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131(6), 1163-1164.
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002663
Kenyon, S., Boulvain, M., & Neilson, J. P. (2010). Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001058.pub2
Zhang, J., Troendle, J., Reddy, U. M., Laughon, S. K., Branch, D. W., Burkman, R., Landy, H. J., Hibbard, J. U., Haberman, S., Ramirez, M. M., Bailit, J. L., Hoffman, M. K., Gregory, K. D., Gonzalez-Quintero, V. H., Kominiarek, M., Learman, L. A., Hatjis, C. G., & Van Veldhuisen, P. (2010). Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(4), 326.e1-326.e10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058
Gharoro EP, Enabudoso EJ. Premature rupture of membranes: risk factors and outcome in a developing country. Niger J Clin Pract. 2009;12(4):403–408.
Veleminsky M, Tosner J. Relationship of vaginal microflora to PROM and preterm delivery. Ceska Gynekol. 2011;76(4):274–278.
Batool A, Imran T, Kamal A. Maternal and fetal outcome in premature rupture of membranes at term. Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2020;26(1):43–47.
Khanum S, Iqbal S, Rehman KU. Fetomaternal outcome in term PROM. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2016;10(1):94–97.
Malik R, Khan MI. Determinants of preterm birth and PROM in Pakistan: a literature review. J Neonatal Biol. 2019;8(2):297.
Shahid A, Noor T. Risk factors and outcomes of term PROM: A study from tertiary care center. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(6):1348–1352.
Sabir N, Farooq S, Sheikh S. Risk factors and fetal outcome in term PROM: A prospective analysis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(3):418–421.
Tita, A. T. N., & Andrews, W. W. (2011). Diagnosis and Management of Clinical Chorioamnionitis. Clinics in Perinatology, 37(2), 339–354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2010.02.003
Naz M, Akram A, Mahmud S. Maternal morbidity in term PROM: evaluation of contributing factors. Biomedica. 2021;37(1):43–48.
Sentilhes L, Goffinet F, Vayssiere C, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of PROM at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;198:12–21.
Romero, R., Dey, S. K., & Fisher, S. J. (2014). Preterm labor: One syndrome, many causes. Science, 345(6198), 760–765.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251816
Goldenberg RL, McClure EM. Reducing PROM-related mortality in low-income settings. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36:73–84.
Mahomed K, Gulmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ. Management of premature rupture of the membranes at term. BMJ. 1995;311(7000):143–6.
Shamshad, Qureshi RN, Islam A. Maternal and neonatal complications in premature rupture of membranes. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(4):312–5.
Dars S, Malik S, Samreen I. Maternal and fetal outcome in premature rupture of membranes at term. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:1–5.
Noor S, Nazar AF, Bashir R, Fawad A. Prevalence of PROM and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcome. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2007;19(4):82–5.
Mercer, B. M. (2005). Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: current approaches to evaluation and management. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics, 32(3), 411-428.
Hannah, M. E., Ohlsson, A., Farine, D., Hewson, S. A., Hodnett, E. D., Myhr, T. L., ... & Willan, A. R. (1996). Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. New England Journal of Medicine, 334(16), 1005-1010.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199604183341601
Caughey, A. B., Robinson, J. N., & Norwitz, E. R. (2008). Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Reviews in obstetrics and gynecology, 1(1), 11.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2492588/
Gunn, G. C., Mishell Jr, D. R., & Morton, D. G. (1970). Premature rupture of the fetal membranes: a review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 106(3), 469-483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(70)90378-9
Shukla AK, Srivastava A, Kumar A. A study of maternal and fetal outcome in premature rupture of membranes at term. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(1):94–7.
Shahid A, Ejaz S, Rehman A. PROM at term: maternal and fetal outcome. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(3):303–7.
Lee J, Romero R, Park J-S, Jun JK, Park CW, Yoon BH. The frequency and significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with a sonographic short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(12):1446–50.
Sharma R, Goyal M, Bhalla P. Maternal and fetal outcome in pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1383–7.
Park JS, Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Oh SY, Han SY. The relationship between cervical dilatation and amniotic fluid index at term with PROM. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(3):227–32.
Jabeen T, Bhutta SZ, Butt MA. Maternal and neonatal outcome of premature rupture of membranes at term. Biomedica. 2012;28(2):247–50.
Shamshad, Memon A, Shaukat N. Complications of premature rupture of membranes. Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2005;11(2):238–40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
