Comparative Study of Inguinal Hernia Repair under Local Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia in Reducing Hospital Stay of Patient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1781Keywords:
Inguinal Hernia Repair, Local Anesthesia, Spinal Anesthesia, Postoperative ComplicationsAbstract
Background: Inguinal hernia is a very common problem in men. Mostly end in hernia repair. As inguinal hernia present in lower abdomen, below umbilicus, repair can be done under spinal anesthesia. Local anesthesia can also be a good replacement for spinal anesthesia. But local evidence is scarce and need to conduct a trial to find more effective and beneficial mode of anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair. Objective: To compare and evaluate the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia in reducing inpatient stay. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration: Surgery Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from September 2022 to March 2023. Material and Methods: There were 40 people undergoing inguinal hernia repair who were enrolled. Consent was obtained, and demographics were noted. Patients were randomly segregated into two groups. In Group A , repair was done under local anesthesia, while in Group B, repair was done under spinal anesthesia. Outcomes were noted and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results: In patients of local anesthesia, mean age was 47.20 ± 17.95 years. In Spinal anesthesia group, mean age of patients was 53.60 ± 13.09 years. The mean duration of hernia was 2.20 ± 1.61 years vs. 2.65 ± 1.73 years, respectively. The mean pain score on day 1 of surgery was 1.85 ± 0.88 with local anesthesia and 4.00 ± 0.79 with spinal anesthesia (p<0.001). Hematoma formed in 8 (40%) cases and seroma in 6 (30%) cases in spinal anesthesia group while zero in local anesthesia group. Urinary retention occurred in 3 (15%) vs. 12 (60%) cases (p<0.05). The mean time taken to start walking was 1.00 ± 0.00 days with local anesthesia vs. 1.55 ± 0.51 days with spinal anesthesia, started using stairs after 2.30 ± 0.47 days vs. 3.20 ± 1.01 days, mean time to return to work was 4.75 ± 0.91 days vs. 6.65 ± 1.18 days (p<0.05). Conclusions: The outcomes of local anesthesia are better than spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.
Downloads
References
Hammoud, M., & Gerken, J. (2023). Inguinal hernia. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK513332/
LeBLANC, K. E., LeBLANC, L. L., & LeBLANC, K. A. (2013). Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. American family physician, 87(12), 844-848.
https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2013/0615/p844.html
Berndsen, M. R., Gudbjartsson, T., & Berndsen, F. H. (2019). Inguinal hernia-review. Laeknabladid, 105(9), 385-391.
https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2019.09.247
Pérez Lara, F. J., Del Rey Moreno, A., & Oliva Muñoz, H. (2014). Do we really know the symptoms of inguinal hernia? Hernia, 19(5), 703-712.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1319-4
Shakil, A., Aparicio, K., Barta, E., & Munez, K. (2020). Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. American family physician, 102(8), 487-492.
https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2020/1015/p487.html
Marcil, G., Schendel, J., Tong, R., Mitchell, P., Church, N., Reso, A., Ball, C., Gill, R., & Debru, E. (2022). The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 65(5), E614-E618.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003421
Dreuning, K. M., Ten Broeke, C. E., Twisk, J. W., Robben, S. G., Van Rijn, R. R., Verbeke, J. I., Van Heurn, L. W., & Derikx, J. P. (2018). Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasonography in predicting contralateral inguinal hernia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Radiology, 29(2), 866-876.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5625-6
Kwee, R. M., & Kwee, T. C. (2018). Ultrasonography in diagnosing clinically occult groin hernia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. European Radiology, 28(11), 4550-4560.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5489-9
O'Brien, J., Sinha, S., & Turner, R. (2021). Inguinal hernia repair: A global perspective. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 91(11), 2288-2295.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17174
Palot, J. P. (2003). Surgery for inguinal hernia: indications and operative principles. La Revue du Praticien, 53(15), 1651-1658.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/14689909
Awad, M. A., Buzalewski, J., Anderson, C., Dove, J. T., Soloski, A., Sharp, N. E., Protyniak, B., & Shabahang, M. M. (2020). Robotic inguinal hernia repair outcomes: Operative time and cost analysis. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 24(4), e2020.00058.
https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2020.00058
Beard, J. H., Ohene-Yeboah, M., DeVries, C. R., & Schecter, W. P. (2015). Hernia and hydrocele. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery, 151-171.
https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0346-8_ch9
Van Veen, R. N., Mahabier, C., Dawson, I., Hop, W. C., Kok, N. F., Lange, J. F., & Jeekel, J. (2008). Spinal or local anesthesia in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Annals of Surgery, 247(3), 428-433.
https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318165b0ff
Kulacoglu, H., & Alptekin, A. (2011). Current options in local anesthesia for groin hernia repairs. Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica, 58(3), 25-35.
https://doi.org/10.2298/aci1103025k
Jain, A., Jain, R., & ChoUdhRIe, A. (2019). Local anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia surgery-An evidence based approach. Int J Anat Radiol Surg, 8(3).
Sharma, A., & Chelawat, P. (2017). Endo‐laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: What is its role? Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 10(2), 111-118.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12387
Nazari, T., Dankbaar, M. E., Sanders, D. L., Anderegg, M. C., Wiggers, T., & Simons, M. P. (2020). Learning inguinal hernia repair? A survey of current practice and of preferred methods of surgical residents. Hernia, 24(5), 995-1002.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02270-y
Li, L., Pang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, Q., & Meng, X. (2020). Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiology, 20(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00980-5
Bhedi, D. A. (2016). Inguinal hernia repair: Comparison of local anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 04(12), 14540-14547.
https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i12.40
Bhardwaj, S., Sharma, S., Bhardwaj, V., & Lal, R. (2020). Comparison of local versus spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia repair. International Surgery Journal, 7(12), 4107.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20205364
Argo, M., Favela, J., Phung, T., & Huerta, S. (2019). Local VS. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Surgery, 218(5), 1008-1015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.024
Reece-Smith, A. M., Maggio, A. Q., Tang, T. Y., & Walsh, S. R. (2009). Local anaesthetic vs. general anaesthetic for inguinal hernia repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 63(12), 1739-1742.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02131.x
Prakash, D., Heskin, L., Doherty, S., & Galvin, R. (2017). Local anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Surgeon, 15(1), 47-57.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
