Comparison of Clinical Outcome in Surgically Treated Vs Conservatively Manged Rockwood Type III ACJ Dislocation

Authors

  • Hassaan Ahmed Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Major General Suhail Amin Professor and HOD, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1757

Keywords:

Acromioclavicular Joint, Rockwood Type III, Shoulder Dislocation, Surgical Fixation, Conservative management

Abstract

Background: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations are frequently encountered shoulder injuries, particularly in active individuals. The management of Rockwood Type III injuries remains contentious, with both surgical and conservative approaches being practiced. This study aims to prospectively compare clinical outcomes between the two modalities. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi, from January 2021- June 2023. A total of 140 patients with isolated Rockwood Type III ACJ dislocations were equally divided into two groups: Group A underwent surgical management (hook plate or TightRope fixation), and Group B received conservative treatment (immobilization and rehabilitation). Patients were followed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-injury. Primary outcomes included Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, radiological alignment, and complication rates. Results: At 6-month follow-up, Group A showed superior outcomes with a significantly higher mean CMS (88.4 ± 6.2 vs. 80.1 ± 7.5, p<0.001) and lower VAS pain scores (1.9 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.3, p<0.001). Radiological subluxation was less frequent in Group A (8.6%) than Group B (24.3%) (p=0.01). Return to pre-injury activity was faster in the surgical group (9.4 vs. 12.6 weeks). Complication rates were higher in Group A (12.9%) due to implant-related issues, compared to 5.7% in Group B. Conclusion: Surgical treatment for Rockwood Type III ACJ dislocations yields better short-term functional and anatomical outcomes compared to conservative management, albeit with a higher complication rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Rooij, P. P., Van Lieshout, E. M., Schurink, I. J., & Verhofstad, M. H. (2020). Current practice in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations; a national survey in The Netherlands. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 47(5), 1417-1427.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01414-0

Moore, B. J., & Sellon, J. L. (2021). Shoulder injuries. Essential Sports Medicine, 175-201.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64316-4_10

Lau, E. T., Hong, C. C., Poh, K. S., Manohara, R., Ng, D. Z., Lim, J. L., & Kumar, V. P. (2021). A relook at the reliability of Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 30(9), 2191-2196.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.016

Refaat, M., Younan, R. E., Elkalyoby, A. S., Seifeldin, A. F., Mohy El Din, A. E., & Abdel Razek, B. H. (2023). Economic reliable Arthroscopic technique for reduction and fixation of acute Acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy Techniques, 12(5), e583-e591.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2022.12.016

Bi, A. S., Robinson, J., Anil, U., Hurley, E. T., Klifto, C. S., Gonzalez-Lomas, G., Alaia, M. J., Strauss, E. J., & Jazrawi, L. M. (2023). Treatment options for acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 32(6), 1146-1158.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.039

Hohmann, E., & Tetsworth, K. (2023). Clinical outcomes for grades III–V acromioclavicular dislocations favor double-Button fixation compared to clavicle hook plate fixation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 33(7), 2831-2846.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03492-3

Guijt, M., Zamanipoor, N. A., Notting, I., M, P. A., Verstegen, M., Biermasz, N., Van, F. W., & Claessen, K. (2022). Towards a pituitary apoplexy classification based on clinical presentation and patient journey. Endocrine Abstracts.

https://doi.org/10.1530/endoabs.81.p172

Cimbanassi, S., & Chiara, O. (2021). Damage control surgery: an update. In Trauma Centers and Acute Care Surgery: A Novel Organizational and Cultural Model (pp. 59-76). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73155-7_6

Berthold, D. P., Muench, L. N., Dyrna, F., Mazzocca, A. D., Garvin, P., Voss, A., Scheiderer, B., Siebenlist, S., Imhoff, A. B., & Beitzel, K. (2022). Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0

Jimson, S. (2021). Residual deformities of the maxillofacial region. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician, 1303-1339.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_61

Fosser, M., & Camporese, A. (2021). Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques. PubMed, 92(5), e2021325–e2021325.

https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i5.10678

Piedade, S. R., Leite Arruda, B. P., De Vasconcelos, R. A., Parker, D. A., & Maffulli, N. (2023). Rehabilitation following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: What has changed since the 1960s?—State of the art. Journal of ISAKOS, 8(3), 153-162.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2022.10.001

Lavaill, M., Martelli, S., Cutbush, K., Gupta, A., Kerr, G. K., & Pivonka, P. (2023). Latarjet’s muscular alterations increase glenohumeral joint stability: A theoretical study. Journal of Biomechanics, 155, 111639.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111639

Liu, S., Li, C., Song, Z., Bai, X., & Wu, H. (2022). Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05261-5

Nie, S., Li, H.-B., Hua, L., Tang, Z.-M., & Lan, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of arthroscopic-assisted Tight-rope technique and clavicular hook plate fixation in the treatment of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05724-9

Farjam, P., Hekman, E., Rouwkema, J., & Verkerke, G. (2022). Bone fixation techniques for managing joint disorders and injuries: A review study. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 126, 104982.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104982

Soler, F., Mocini, F., Djemeto, D. T., Cattaneo, S., Saccomanno, M. F., & Milano, G. (2021). No differences between conservative and surgical management of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: A scoping review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(7), 2194-2201.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06377-8

Costa, G. G., Perelli, S., Grassi, A., Russo, A., Zaffagnini, S., & Monllau, J. C. (2022). Minimizing the risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. A narrative review of the current evidence. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 9(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00461-3

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Ahmed, H., & Suhail Amin, M. G. (2025). Comparison of Clinical Outcome in Surgically Treated Vs Conservatively Manged Rockwood Type III ACJ Dislocation. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(6), 639–642. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1757