Haemodynamic Changes with Different Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Muhammad Mudassar Sattar Department of General Surgery Unit 2, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Amer Ud Din Department of General Surgery Unit 2, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Mudassar Murtaza Department of General Surgery Unit 2, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Amer Mian Department of General Surgery Unit 2, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Warda Khalid Department of General Surgery Unit 2, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Wajid Department of General Surgery Unit 2, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1679

Keywords:

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Pneumoperitoneum, Hemodynamic Changes

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy commonly involves the creation of pneumoperitoneum using carbon dioxide (CO₂), which can significantly influence cardiovascular dynamics.  Objective: To compare the mean hemodynamic changes associated with different pneumoperitoneum pressures in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Surgery at Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from December 16, 2023, to June 17, 2024. A total of 70 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups of 35 each. Group 1 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (8–10 mmHg), while Group 2 had standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (11–13 mmHg).  Results: At 60 minutes, the mean MAP in Group 1 (low pressure) was significantly lower at 85.14 ± 5.93 mmHg compared to 97.83 ± 9.38 mmHg in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The mean heart rate was also lower in Group 1 (98.97 ± 12.45 bpm) versus Group 2 (108.51 ± 11.71 bpm; p = 0.002). Similarly, oxygen saturation was higher in Group 1 (96.80 ± 1.41%) than in Group 2 (94.43 ± 1.70%; p < 0.001). These findings indicate more stable hemodynamic parameters in patients subjected to lower pneumoperitoneum pressures. Conclusion: Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (8–10 mmHg) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in significantly more favorable hemodynamic outcomes compared to standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (11–13 mmHg). These findings support the clinical benefit of using reduced pressure settings when feasible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ghosh, B. C., & Gangopadhyay, A. (2018). Prospective randomised trial of standard pressure versus low pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary care hospital from Kolkata: Our experience. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(4), 17–22.

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v9i4.19780

Gohil, A. (2018). Comparison of low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary care institute of western India. Int Surg J, 5(5), 1776. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181569

Chaudhary A, Jain D. Low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with comorbid conditions: A prospective study. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2022;9(3):1314–22.

Ponduru, S., Nanda, A., Pakhare, V. P., Gopinath, R., Sangineni, K. S., & Priyanka, R. D. (2023). The effect of different pressures of pneumoperitoneum on the optic nerve sheath diameter – A prospective study. The Indian Anaesthetists Forum, 24(2), 149-153.

https://doi.org/10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_107_23

Rauseo, M., Spadaro, S., Mirabella, L., Cotoia, A., Laforgia, D., Gaudino, G., Vinella, F., Ferrara, G., Gattullo, A., Tullo, L., & Cinnella, G. (2023). Electrical impedance tomography during abdominal Laparoscopic surgery: A physiological pilot study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(23), 7467.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237467

Eva, I., Rosario, V., Guglielmo, R., Clarissa, V., Federica, L. P., Emma, C., Rosaria, C. R., & Veronica, V. (2022). Laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial comparing intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and arterial-blood gas changes at two different pneumoperitoneal pressure values. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 81, 104562.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104562

Ahmad, M. S., Sadien, I., & Ivanov, B. (2022). Changes in the Emergency General Surgery Operations in the Setting of COVID-19 and Impact of Strategy of Non-Operative Management on Outcomes in Acute Appendicitis. Cureus, 14(8).

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27552

Carissimi, F., Scotti, M. A., Ciulli, C., Fogliati, A., Uggeri, F., Chiarelli, M., Braga, M., Romano, F., & Garancini, M. (2022). COVID-19 and Liver Surgery: How the Pandemic Affected an Italian Medium-Volume HBP Center. Frontiers in Surgery, 9.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.918348

Vigneswaran, Y., Prachand, V. N., Posner, M. C., Matthews, J. B., & Hussain, M. (2020). What Is the Appropriate Use of Laparoscopy over Open Procedures in the Current COVID-19 Climate? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 24(7), 1686–1691.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04592-9

Yang, X., Cheng, Y., Cheng, N., Gong, J., Bai, L., Zhao, L., & Deng, Y. (2022). Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022(3).

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009569.pub4

Kapoor, T., Wrenn, S. M., Callas, P. W., & Abu-Jaish, W. (2018). Cost analysis and supply utilization of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2018, 1-5.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7838103

Strasberg, S. M. (2018). Tokyo guidelines for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 227(6), 624.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.005

Blythe, J., Herrmann, E., Faust, D., Falk, S., Edwards-Lehr, T., Stockhausen, F., Hanisch, E., & Buia, A. (2018). Acute cholecystitis – a cohort study in a real-world clinical setting (REWO study, NCT02796443). Pragmatic and Observational Research, 9, 69-75.

https://doi.org/10.2147/por.s169255

Kose S, Grice K, Orsi W, Ballal M, Coolen M. Metagenomics of pigmented and cholesterol gallstones: the putative role of bacteria. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11218.

Sherwinter, D. (2019, February 2). Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Background, Indications, Contraindications. Medscape.com.

https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1582292-overview

Adams D. B. (2025). Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Internet]. MUSC Health.

https://muschealth.org/medical-services/ddc/patients/gi-surgery/laparoscopic-surgery/laparoscopic-cholecystectomy

Hassler, K. R., Collins, J. T., Philip, K., & Jones, M. W. (2023). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK448145/

Özdemir-van Brunschot, D. M., van Laarhoven, K. C., Scheffer, G. J., Pouwels, S., Wever, K. E., & Warlé, M. C. (2016). What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surgical endoscopy, 30, 2049-2065.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4454-9

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Sattar, M. M., Amer Ud Din, Murtaza, M., Mian, M. A., Khalid, W., & Wajid, M. (2025). Haemodynamic Changes with Different Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 929–933. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1679