Diagnostic Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Ultrasound in Mullerian Duct Anomalies in Comparison to MRI

Authors

  • Ghazal Mehtab Department of Radiology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Arooj Afzal Department of Radiology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Riaz Aamir Department of Radiology, DHQ Hospital, Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Samia Nawaz Department of Radiology, Brigadier Shafeeq Memorial Trust Hospital, Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Adnan Rashid Department of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Rai Medical College, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Irshad Ahmad Department of Radiology, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Sargodha and Niazi Welfare Teaching Hospital, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1530

Keywords:

Müllerian Duct Anomalies (Mdas), 3-Dimensional Ultrasound (3D US) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Diagnostic Accuracy, Uterine Anomalies

Abstract

Introduction: Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are the congenital anomalies of female reproductive tract that can have significant impact on a woman’s fertility and her pregnancy outcomes. Accurate imaging is essential for their diagnosis and management. 2-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) and MRI are the traditional methods that have been mainstays for the diagnosing purpose, but the introduction of 3D Ultrasound in the domain of ultrasound has offered potential advantages in visualization and enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Objective: To find out what is the diagnostic accuracy of 3-Dimensional ultrasound in diagnosing Mullerian duct anomalies as compared to MRI. Materials and Methodology: Articles included in this review were identified through systematic searches of databases such as Pub Med, Paywall, Wiley.com and Google Scholar. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the use of 3D ultrasound in diagnosing Müllerian duct anomalies. Results: Based on different studies we found that 3 Dimensional Ultrasound proved to be highly accurate in diagnosis of Uterine anomalies and showed strong agreement with MRI(P <0.01). Conclusion: 3D ultrasound has proved to be an excellent modality for the diagnosis of mullerian duct modalities. It’s low cost, easy access and real time imaging make it promising and a good diagnosing tool. Although MRI is the standard reference, 3D ultrasound can be preffered over it if its limitations are minimized as the diagnostic accuracy is almost similar to MRI if performed by experienced hands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kumar, A., & Sinha, R. R. (2019). Mullerian Duct Anomaly-A Spectrum of Varied Clinical Manifestations.

https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/sea-202680

Behr, S. C., Courtier, J. L., & Qayyum, A. (2012). Imaging of Müllerian Duct Anomalies. RadioGraphics, 32(6), E233–E250.

https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125515

Byrne, J., Nussbaum-Blask, A. R., Taylor, W. S., Rubin, A., Hill, M. C., O’Donnell, R., & Shulman, S. (2000). Prevalence of m�llerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94(1), 9–12.

https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-8628(20000904)94:1%3C9::aid-ajmg3%3E3.0.co;2-h

Abd elsalam, S. M., Abd elmegeed, N. E., Said, A. H. M., & Sayed, M. A. elghafar. (2020). Role of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00156-8

OLPIN, J. D., & HEILBRUN, M. (2009). Imaging of Müllerian Duct Anomalies. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 52(1), 40–56.

https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0b013e3181958439

Qin, C., Lee, P., & Luo, L. (2024). The Comparison between Three-dimensional enhanced Conventional Pelvic Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Obstructive Müllerian Anomalies and its Concordance with Surgical Diagnosis. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2024.07.004

Caliskan, E., Ozkan, S., Cakiroglu, Y., Sarisoy, H. T., Corakci, A., & Ozeren, S. (2010). Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, NA-NA.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20662

Troiano, R. N., & McCarthy, S. M. (2004). Müllerian Duct Anomalies: Imaging and Clinical Issues. Radiology, 233(1), 19–34.

https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331020777

Kougioumtsidou, A., Mikos, T., Grimbizis, G. F., Karavida, A., Theodoridis, T. D., Sotiriadis, A., ... & Athanasiadis, A. P. (2019). Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 299, 779-789.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05050-x

Grigore, M., Cojocaru, C., Mares, A., & Indrei, A. (2009). Mullerian duct anomalies: Clinical Issues and of 3D Ultrasound Diagnosis. Gineco. ro, 5(2), 101-105.

https://gineco.eu/system/revista/6/100-105.pdf

Moini, A., Mohammadi, S., Hosseini, R., Eslami, B., & Ahmadi, F. (2013). Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Sonography for Diagnosis and Classification of Congenital Uterine Anomalies. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 32(6), 923–927.

https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.6.923

Ergenoglu, A. M., Sahin, Ç., Şimşek, D., Akdemir, A., Yeniel, A. Ö., Yerli, H., & Sendag, F. (2016). Comparison of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in surgically proven Müllerian duct anomaly cases. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 197, 22–26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.11.010

Ludwin, A., & Ludwin, I. (2015). Comparison of the ESHRE–ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Human Reproduction, 30(3), 569-580.

https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu344

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Mehtab, G., Afzal, A., Aamir, M. R., Nawaz, S., Rashid, A., & Ahmad, I. (2025). Diagnostic Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Ultrasound in Mullerian Duct Anomalies in Comparison to MRI. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1530

Most read articles by the same author(s)