Comparison of Frequency of Burst Abdomen in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Women

Seerat e Zehra

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1483

Authors

Seerat e Zehra Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University Larkana, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1483

Keywords:

Burst Abdomen, Wound Dehiscence, Cesarean Section, Gestational Diabetes, Postoperative Complications, Surgical Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Burst abdomen, or postoperative wound dehiscence, is a serious complication of abdominal surgeries, particularly cesarean sections. Objective: To compare the frequency of burst abdomen in diabetic and nondiabetic women after cesarean section and assess the associated risk. Methods: This cohort study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Shaikh Zaid Women Hospital, Larkana from Nov 2024 to March 2025. A total of 220 women aged 18–40 years undergoing cesarean section at ≥37 weeks gestation was included, with 110 diabetics and 110 nondiabetics. Data on demographic variables, intraoperative findings, and postoperative wound status were collected. Results: The overall frequency of burst abdomen was 7.3%. Among diabetic women, 10.9% developed burst abdomen compared to 3.6% in nondiabetics (p = 0.042). The relative risk was 3.03 (95% CI: 1.00–9.13), indicating that diabetic women were three times more likely to develop burst abdomen. Higher risk was also observed in patients with BMI ≥28 kg/m², emergency cesarean sections, and operative time ≥60 minutes. Conclusion: It is concluded that diabetic women are at significantly higher risk of developing burst abdomen following cesarean section. Early identification, preoperative risk assessment, and optimal perioperative glycemic control are critical to improving surgical outcomes in this high-risk population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Negrato CA, Mattar R, Gomes MB. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2012;4(1):41.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-4-41

Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M. Diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2016;38(7):667–79.e1.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2016.04.002

Metcalfe A, Sabr Y, Hutcheon JA, Donovan L, Lyons J, Burrows J, et al. Trends in obstetric intervention and pregnancy outcomes of Canadian women with diabetes in pregnancy from 2004 to 2015. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2017;1(12):1540–9.

https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2017-00376

Mahey R, Ghetla S, Rajpurohit J, Desai D, Suryawanshi S. A prospective study of risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence. Int Surg J. 2016;4(1):5.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163983

Martin ET, Kaye KS, Knott C, Nguyen H, Santarossa M, Evans R, et al. Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2016;37(1):88–99.

https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.249

De Jonge SW, Gans SL, Atema JJ, Solomkin JS, Dellinger PE, Boermeester MA. Timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in 54,552 patients and the risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(29).

https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000006903

Takoudes TC, Weitzen S, Slocum J, Malee M. Risk of cesarean wound complications in diabetic gestations. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;191(3):958–63.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.063

Jensen TK, Kvist M, Damkjær MB, Burcharth J. Short-term outcomes in mesh versus suture-only treatment of burst abdomen: a case-series from a university hospital. Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):100. PMID: 39966188; PMCID: PMC11835968.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03279-x

Abbasi MS, Ashraf I, Noor A, Zaman S, Shaukat A, Nagra BS. Frequency of Burst Abdomen and Associated Risk Factors After Emergency Laparotomy in A Tertiary Care Hospital from Rawalpindi. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2025 Apr. 29 [cited 2025 May 22];75(2):409-12.

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i2.11868.

Söderbäck H, Masood A, Leo J, Sandblom G (2022) Introduction of small stitch small bite technique: a retrospective long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(6):2527–2535.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02530-8

Albertsmeier M, Hofmann A, Baumann P et al (2022) Effects of the short-stitch technique for midline abdominal closure: short-term results from the randomised-controlled ESTOIH trial. Hernia 26(1):87–95.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02410-y

Denys A, Monbailliu T, Allaeys M et al (2021) Management of abdominal wound dehiscence: update of the literature and meta-analysis. Hernia 25:449–462.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02294-4

Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA et al (2022) Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia societies. Br J Surg 109:1239–1250.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac302

Mehdorn M, Groos L, Kassahun W, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I, Moulla Y. Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques. BMC Surg 2021;21:1.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01219-x7.

Hegazy TO, Soliman SS. Abdominal wall dehiscence in emergency midline laparotomy: incidence and risk factors. Egypt J Surg 2020;39(2).

https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_7_208.

Wong SY, Kingsnorth AN. Abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Surgery2002;20(5):100-103.

https://doi.org/10.1383/surg.20.5.100.14624

Ogbuanya AU, Ugwu NB. Emergency laparotomy at district hospitals in a developing nation: a review of indications and outcomes of treatment. J Emerg Pract Trauma 2021;7(2):111-117.

https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2021.0614.

Kenig J, Richter P, Lasek A, Zbierska K, Zurawska S. The efficacy of risk scores for predicting abdominal wound dehiscence: a case-controlled validation study. BMCSurg2014;14:1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-65