Assessment of Post-Procedural Mitral Regurgitation and Its Mechanisms Using 3D Transthoracic Echocardiography Following PMBC in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

Authors

  • Hira Zakria Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology (AFIC), Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Nadir Khan Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology (AFIC), Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Amina Azhar PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sidra Zahoor PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Faizan Amjad PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Fasih Ullah Khan PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1387

Keywords:

Post-Procedural Mitral Regurgitation, 3D Transthoracic Echocardiography, PMBC, Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

Abstract

Background: Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) remains a significant cardiovascular burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy (PMBC) is the standard intervention, but mitral regurgitation (MR) remains a major complication. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the incidence, severity, and underlying mechanisms of MR following PMBC using three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE). Methods: In this prospective study, 300 patients with severe symptomatic rheumatic MS underwent PMBC from September, 2023 to December, 2024. Baseline and post-procedural echocardiographic assessments were performed, and mechanisms of MR were classified using 3D TTE. Results: New or worsening MR occurred in 41% of patients post-PMBC. MR was mild in 16%, moderate in 15%, and severe in 10% of cases. Commissural MR was the most common mechanism of significant MR (32%), followed by commissural MR with posterior leaflet involvement (26%) and central MR (17%). Leaflet tear involving the central scallops accounted for 10 of the 32 severe MR cases. Conclusions: MR is a frequent complication following PMBC, with distinct mechanistic patterns identifiable via 3D TTE. Understanding these mechanisms may inform clinical decision-making and long-term clinical outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, Karthikeyan G, Beaton A, Bukhman G, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990–2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):713–22.

https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1603693

Zühlke L, Engel ME, Karthikeyan G, et al. Characteristics, complications, and gaps in evidence-based interventions in rheumatic heart disease: the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (the REMEDY study). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(18):1115–22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.003

Beg AB, Younas M, Asma T. Rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Prof Med J. 2016;23(3):324–7.

https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2016.23.03.1482

Turi ZG, Reyes VP, Raju BS, et al. Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed commissurotomy for mitral stenosis: a prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 1991;83(4):1179–85.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.83.4.1179

Desnos C, Iung B, Himbert D, et al. Temporal trends on percutaneous mitral commissurotomy: 30 years of experience. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(18):e012031.

https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.119.012031

Nunes MCP, Levine RA, Braulio R, et al. Mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty: insights into mechanisms and impact on clinical outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(11):2513–26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.020

Kaul UA, Singh S, Kalra GS, et al. Mitral regurgitation following percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy: a single-center experience. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;9(2):262–6.

Essop MR, Wisenbaugh T, Skoularigis J, Middlemost S, Sareli P. Mitral regurgitation following mitral balloon valvotomy: differing mechanisms for severe versus mild-to-moderate lesions. Circulation. 1991;84(4): 1669–79.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.84.4.1669

Kim MJ, Song JK, Song JM, et al. Long-term outcomes of significant mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Circulation. 2006;114(25): 2815–22.

https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.658088

Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(4):303–71.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2543-1463.282191

Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(1):3–46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.11.010

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

Zakria, H., Khan, M. N., Azhar, A., Zahoor, S., Amjad, F., & Khan, F. U. (2025). Assessment of Post-Procedural Mitral Regurgitation and Its Mechanisms Using 3D Transthoracic Echocardiography Following PMBC in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1387