Retracted
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1255Keywords:
Peptide/Protein Therapeutics, Biopharmaceuticals, Lipid-Based Drug Delivery, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles, Nanostructured Lipid Carriers, Oral BioavailabilityAbstract
The oral delivery and formulation of therapeutic peptide- and protein-based biopharmaceuticals continue to pose significant challenges within the pharmaceutical domain. These biomolecules exhibit inherently low oral bioavailability, primarily due to limited gastrointestinal solubility and permeability. Contributing factors include high molecular weight, poor membrane permeability, and extensive degradation by chemical and enzymatic processes within the gastrointestinal tract, all of which restrict their therapeutic potential. This review critically examines the barriers associated with oral administration of peptide/protein therapeutics and emphasizes the emerging role of lipid-based drug delivery systems (LBDDSs) specifically, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as innovative platforms to overcome these limitations. These lipid-based systems offer several pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages, including protection against enzymatic degradation, improved drug solubility and absorption, enhanced mucosal permeability, reduced first-pass metabolism, and the potential for controlled and sustained release. The nanoscale size and modifiable surface properties of SLNs and NLCs further facilitate targeted delivery, prolonged systemic circulation, and improved therapeutic index. LBDDSs are characterized by favorable features such as ease of fabrication, scalability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, low systemic toxicity, and the ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and lipophilic agents. These attributes collectively underscore their promise in enhancing oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of peptide/protein-based drugs. Despite these advantages, critical formulation challenges particularly those related to plasma stability, membrane translocation, and circulation half-life persist and require further investigation in future drug development efforts.
Downloads
References
Walsh G. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36 (12):1136–45.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4305
Craik DJ, Fairlie DP, Liras S, Price D. The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;81 (1):136–47.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12055
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37 (Suppl 1):S81–90.
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-s081
Murray PG, Dattani MT. Growth hormone deficiency and combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22 (1):129–40.
Ratjen F, Bell SC, Rowe SM, Goss CH, Quittner AL, Bush A. Cystic fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15010.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.10
Rund D, Rachmilewitz E. β-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353 (11):1135–46.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra050436
Peyvandi F, Palla R, Menegatti M, et al. Rare bleeding disorders. Haemophilia. 2014;20 (Suppl 4):S148–53.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01271.x
Lillicrap D. The role of von Willebrand factor in platelet-fibrinogen interactions. Thromb Res. 2008;122 (Suppl 1):S13–6.
Otvos L Jr. Peptide-based drug design: here and now. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;716:1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-419-3_1
Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20 (1):122–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003
Pace CN, Fu H, Fryar KL, et al. Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability. J Mol Biol. 2011;408 (3):514–28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.053
Baldwin RL. Energetics of protein folding. J Mol Biol. 2007;371 (2):283–301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.078
Wang W. Instability, stabilization, and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm. 1999;185 (2):129–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00152-0
Carpenter JF, Manning MC. Rational design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: some practical advice. Pharm Res. 1999;16 (3):372–7.
Kamerzell TJ, Esfandiary R, Joshi SB, Middaugh CR, Volkin DB. Protein-excipient interactions: mechanisms and biophysical characterization applied to protein formulation development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63 (13):1118–59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.07.006
Merrifield RB. Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85 (14):2149–54.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00897a025
Vlieghe P, Lisowski V, Martinez J, Khrestchatisky M. Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15 (1-2):40–56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.009
Hamman JH, Enslin GM, Kotzé AF. Oral delivery of peptide drugs: barriers and developments. BioDrugs. 2005;19 (3):165–77.
https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200519030-00003
Leader B, Baca QJ, Golan DE. Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7 (1):21–39.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2399
Walsh G. Post-translational modifications of protein biopharmaceuticals. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15 (17-18):773–80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2010.06.009
Goldberg M, Gomez-Orellana I. Challenges for the oral delivery of macromolecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2 (4):289–95.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1067
Borde A, Paul P, Bansal A, et al. Technologies for improved peptide delivery. Pharm Pat Anal. 2016;5 (2):87–96.
Patel A, Patel M, Yang X, Mitra AK. Recent advances in protein and peptide drug delivery: a special emphasis on polymeric nanoparticles. Protein Pept Lett. 2014;21 (11):1102–20.
https://doi.org/10.2174/0929866521666140807114240
Wang W, Singh S, Zeng DL, King K, Nema S. Antibody structure, instability, and formulation. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96 (1):1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20727
Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharm Res. 2010;27 (4):544–75.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6
Mahato RI, Narang AS, Thoma L, Miller DD. Emerging trends in oral delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2003;20 (2-3):153–214.
https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v20.i23.30
Bruno BJ, Miller GD, Lim CS. Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2013;4 (11):1443–67.
https://doi.org/10.4155/tde.13.104
Morishita M, Peppas NA. Is the oral route possible for peptide and protein drug delivery? Drug Discov Today. 2006;11 (19-20):905–10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.08.005
Ryser S, Han FY, Charman SA, Porter CJ. Effects of endothelin-1 and bradykinin on the systemic disposition of protein therapeutics. Pharm Res. 2004;21 (1):41–8.
Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Protein release from gelatin matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998;31 (3):287–301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00125-7
Richter WF, Bhansali SG, Morris ME. Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration. AAPS J. 2012;14 (3):559–70.
https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9367-0
Supersaxo A, Hein WR, Steffen H. Effect of molecular weight on lymphatic absorption of water-soluble compounds following subcutaneous administration. Pharm Res. 1990;7 (2):167–9.
Crommelin DJA, Storm G, Verrijk R, et al. Shifting paradigms: biopharmaceuticals versus low molecular weight drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2003;266:3–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00376-4
altzman M. Drug Delivery: Engineering Principles for Drug Therapy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195085891.003.0005
Ugwoke MI, Agu RU, Verbeke N, et al. Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: background, applications, trends and future perspectives. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005;57:1640–1665.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.009
Myles ME, Neumann DM, Hill JM. Recent progress in ocular drug delivery for posterior segment disease: emphasis on transscleral iontophoresis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005;57:2063–2079.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.08.006
Smart JD. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:507–517.
https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.507
Mackay M, Phillips J, Hastewell J. Peptide drug delivery: colonic and rectal absorption. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997;28:253–273.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00076-8
Hussain A, Ahsan F. The vagina as a route for systemic drug delivery. J. Control. Release. 2005;103:301–313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.034
Schuetz YB, Naik A, Guy RH, et al. Emerging strategies for the transdermal delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:533–548.
https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.533
Agu RU, Ugwoke MI, Armand M, et al. The lung as a route for systemic delivery of therapeutic proteins and peptides. Respir. Res. 2001;2:198–209.
Bosquillon C, Préat V, Vanbever R. Pulmonary delivery of growth hormone using dry powders and visualization of its local fate in rats. J. Control. Release. 2004;96:233–244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.027
Ghilzai NMK, Desai A. Facing the challenges of transmucosal absorption—buccal, nasal and rectal routes, Pharma Tech 2004, Business Briefing World Market Series, London, 2004, pp. 104–106.
Florence AT, Attwood D. Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 2006.
Cleland JL, Langer R. Formulation and delivery of proteins and peptides: design and development strategies, in: J.L. Cleland, R. Langer (Eds.), Formulation and Delivery of Proteins and Peptides, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1994, pp. 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1994-0567.ch001
Metselaar JM, Mastrobattista E, Storm G. Liposomes for intravenous drug targeting: design and applications. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2002;4:319–329.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557023405873
Gombotz WR, Pettit DK. Biodegradable polymers for protein and peptide drug delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 1995;6:332–351.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bc00034a002
Packhaeuser CB, Schnieders J, Oster CG, et al. In situ forming parenteral drug delivery systems: an overview. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2004;58:445–455.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.003
Kompella UB, Lee VHL. Delivery systems for penetration enhancement of peptide and protein drugs: design considerations, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;46:211–245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00137-x
Prego C, Torres D, Alonso MJ. The potential of chitosan for the oral administration of peptides. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:843–854.
https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.5.843
Ugwoke MI, Agu RU, Verbeke N, et al. Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: background, applications, trends and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:1640–1665.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.009
Alpar HO, Somavarapu S, Atuah KN, et al. Biodegradable mucoadhesive particulates for nasal and pulmonary antigen and DNA delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:411–430.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.09.004
Schuetz YB, Naik A, Guy RH, et al. Emerging strategies for the transdermal delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:533–548.
https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.533
Langer R. Where a pill won't reach. Sci Am. 2003;288:50–57.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0403-50
Myles ME, Neumann DM, Hill JM. Recent progress in ocular drug delivery for posterior segment disease: emphasis on transscleral iontophoresis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:2063–2079.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.08.006
Smart JD. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:507–517.
https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.507
Choonara BF, Choonara YE, Kumar P, et al. A review of advanced oral drug delivery technologies facilitating the protection and absorption of protein and peptide molecules. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:1269-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.006
Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J. Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: the gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:557-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.009
des Rieux A, Fievez V, Garinot M, et al. Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach. J Control Release. 2006;116(1):1-27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013
Prego C, Torres D, Fernandez-Megia E, et al. Chitosan–PEG nanocapsules as new carriers for oral peptide delivery: effect of chitosan pegylation degree. J Control Release. 2006;111(3):299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.015
Amidon GL, Lennernaes H, Shah VP, et al. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995;12:413–20.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016212804288
Lipinski CA. Avoiding investment in doomed drugs—is solubility an industry wide Acceproblem? Curr Drug Discov. 2001;1:17–9.
Murakami T, Takano M. Intestinal efflux transporters and drug absorption. Exp Op Drug Met Tox. 2008;4:923–39.
https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.4.7.923.
Uekama K, Hirayama F, Irie T. Cyclodextrin drug carrier systems. Chem Rev. 1998;98:2045–2076.
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr970025p
Report: Biotechnology Medicines in Development, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, Washington DC, 2019.
Hillery AM. Drug delivery, the basic concepts, in: A.M. Hillery, A.W. Lloyd, J. Swarbrick (Eds.), Drug Delivery and Targeting for Pharmacists and Pharmaceutical Scientists, Taylor & Francis, London, 2001, pp. 1–48.
Frokjaer S, Otzen DE. Protein drug stability: a formulation challenge. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):298-306.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1695
Banga AK. Drug delivery today, Pharma Tech 2002, Business Briefing World Market Series, London, 2002, pp. 150–154.
Crommelin D, van Winden E, Mekking A. Delivery of pharmaceutical proteins, in: M.E. Aulton (Ed.), Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Forms Design, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 2001, pp. 544–553.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00152-0
Mehrdadi S. Acute Bacterial Meningitis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention. J Arch Mil Med. Online ahead of Print ; 6(4):e84749.
https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm.84749.
Mehrdadi S. Drug delivery of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) to target brain tumors. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin.
https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2023.062
Tsomaia N. Peptide therapeutics: targeting the undruggable space. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;94:459-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.014
Global Data 2015.
http://www.globaldata.com. 2015.
Tomita M, Shiga M, Hayashi M, et al. Enhancement of colonic drug absorption by the paracellular permeation route. Pharm Res. 1988;5(12):786-9.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015992819290
Pappenheimer JR. Physiological regulation of transepithelial impedance in the intestinal mucosa of rats and hamsters. J Membr Biol. 1987;100:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209146
Tang VW, Goodenough DA. Paracellular ion channel at the tight junction. Biophys J. 2003;84(3): 1660–1673.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74975-3.
Florence AT. Issues in oral nanoparticle drug carrier uptake and targeting. J Drug Target. 2004;12:65–70.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860410001693706
Burton PS, Conradi RA, Hilgers AR. (B) Mechanisms of peptide and protein absorption: (2) transcellular mechanism of peptide and protein absorption: passive aspects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1991;7:365–385.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409X(91)90014-
Giannasca PJ, Giannasca KT, Leichtner AM, et al. Human intestinal M cells display the sialyl Lewis A antigen. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:946–953.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
