Retracted

Authors

  • Anam Adil Riphah Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Riphah International University, Faisalabad Campus, Pakistan.
  • Fida Muhammad Gomal Center of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KPK, Pakistan.
  • Qasim Ishtiaq Department of Medicine, NMC ZINDMAAN, Turbat, Balochistan, Pakistan.
  • Sana Rashid Riphah Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Riphah International University Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hunza Rashid Department of Life Sciences, Gulab Devi Educational Complex Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1255

Keywords:

Peptide/Protein Therapeutics, Biopharmaceuticals, Lipid-Based Drug Delivery, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles, Nanostructured Lipid Carriers, Oral Bioavailability

Abstract

The oral delivery and formulation of therapeutic peptide- and protein-based biopharmaceuticals continue to pose significant challenges within the pharmaceutical domain. These biomolecules exhibit inherently low oral bioavailability, primarily due to limited gastrointestinal solubility and permeability. Contributing factors include high molecular weight, poor membrane permeability, and extensive degradation by chemical and enzymatic processes within the gastrointestinal tract, all of which restrict their therapeutic potential. This review critically examines the barriers associated with oral administration of peptide/protein therapeutics and emphasizes the emerging role of lipid-based drug delivery systems (LBDDSs) specifically, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as innovative platforms to overcome these limitations. These lipid-based systems offer several pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages, including protection against enzymatic degradation, improved drug solubility and absorption, enhanced mucosal permeability, reduced first-pass metabolism, and the potential for controlled and sustained release. The nanoscale size and modifiable surface properties of SLNs and NLCs further facilitate targeted delivery, prolonged systemic circulation, and improved therapeutic index. LBDDSs are characterized by favorable features such as ease of fabrication, scalability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, low systemic toxicity, and the ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and lipophilic agents. These attributes collectively underscore their promise in enhancing oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of peptide/protein-based drugs. Despite these advantages, critical formulation challenges particularly those related to plasma stability, membrane translocation, and circulation half-life persist and require further investigation in future drug development efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Walsh G. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36 (12):1136–45.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4305

Craik DJ, Fairlie DP, Liras S, Price D. The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;81 (1):136–47.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12055

American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37 (Suppl 1):S81–90.

https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-s081

Murray PG, Dattani MT. Growth hormone deficiency and combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22 (1):129–40.

Ratjen F, Bell SC, Rowe SM, Goss CH, Quittner AL, Bush A. Cystic fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15010.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.10

Rund D, Rachmilewitz E. β-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353 (11):1135–46.

https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra050436

Peyvandi F, Palla R, Menegatti M, et al. Rare bleeding disorders. Haemophilia. 2014;20 (Suppl 4):S148–53.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01271.x

Lillicrap D. The role of von Willebrand factor in platelet-fibrinogen interactions. Thromb Res. 2008;122 (Suppl 1):S13–6.

Otvos L Jr. Peptide-based drug design: here and now. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;716:1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-419-3_1

Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20 (1):122–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003

Pace CN, Fu H, Fryar KL, et al. Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability. J Mol Biol. 2011;408 (3):514–28.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.053

Baldwin RL. Energetics of protein folding. J Mol Biol. 2007;371 (2):283–301.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.078

Wang W. Instability, stabilization, and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm. 1999;185 (2):129–88.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00152-0

Carpenter JF, Manning MC. Rational design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: some practical advice. Pharm Res. 1999;16 (3):372–7.

Kamerzell TJ, Esfandiary R, Joshi SB, Middaugh CR, Volkin DB. Protein-excipient interactions: mechanisms and biophysical characterization applied to protein formulation development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63 (13):1118–59.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.07.006

Merrifield RB. Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85 (14):2149–54.

https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00897a025

Vlieghe P, Lisowski V, Martinez J, Khrestchatisky M. Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15 (1-2):40–56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.009

Hamman JH, Enslin GM, Kotzé AF. Oral delivery of peptide drugs: barriers and developments. BioDrugs. 2005;19 (3):165–77.

https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200519030-00003

Leader B, Baca QJ, Golan DE. Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7 (1):21–39.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2399

Walsh G. Post-translational modifications of protein biopharmaceuticals. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15 (17-18):773–80.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2010.06.009

Goldberg M, Gomez-Orellana I. Challenges for the oral delivery of macromolecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2 (4):289–95.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1067

Borde A, Paul P, Bansal A, et al. Technologies for improved peptide delivery. Pharm Pat Anal. 2016;5 (2):87–96.

Patel A, Patel M, Yang X, Mitra AK. Recent advances in protein and peptide drug delivery: a special emphasis on polymeric nanoparticles. Protein Pept Lett. 2014;21 (11):1102–20.

https://doi.org/10.2174/0929866521666140807114240

Wang W, Singh S, Zeng DL, King K, Nema S. Antibody structure, instability, and formulation. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96 (1):1–26.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20727

Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharm Res. 2010;27 (4):544–75.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6

Mahato RI, Narang AS, Thoma L, Miller DD. Emerging trends in oral delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2003;20 (2-3):153–214.

https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v20.i23.30

Bruno BJ, Miller GD, Lim CS. Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2013;4 (11):1443–67.

https://doi.org/10.4155/tde.13.104

Morishita M, Peppas NA. Is the oral route possible for peptide and protein drug delivery? Drug Discov Today. 2006;11 (19-20):905–10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.08.005

Ryser S, Han FY, Charman SA, Porter CJ. Effects of endothelin-1 and bradykinin on the systemic disposition of protein therapeutics. Pharm Res. 2004;21 (1):41–8.

Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Protein release from gelatin matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998;31 (3):287–301.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00125-7

Richter WF, Bhansali SG, Morris ME. Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration. AAPS J. 2012;14 (3):559–70.

https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9367-0

Supersaxo A, Hein WR, Steffen H. Effect of molecular weight on lymphatic absorption of water-soluble compounds following subcutaneous administration. Pharm Res. 1990;7 (2):167–9.

Crommelin DJA, Storm G, Verrijk R, et al. Shifting paradigms: biopharmaceuticals versus low molecular weight drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2003;266:3–16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00376-4

altzman M. Drug Delivery: Engineering Principles for Drug Therapy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195085891.003.0005

Ugwoke MI, Agu RU, Verbeke N, et al. Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: background, applications, trends and future perspectives. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005;57:1640–1665.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.009

Myles ME, Neumann DM, Hill JM. Recent progress in ocular drug delivery for posterior segment disease: emphasis on transscleral iontophoresis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005;57:2063–2079.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.08.006

Smart JD. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:507–517.

https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.507

Mackay M, Phillips J, Hastewell J. Peptide drug delivery: colonic and rectal absorption. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997;28:253–273.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00076-8

Hussain A, Ahsan F. The vagina as a route for systemic drug delivery. J. Control. Release. 2005;103:301–313.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.034

Schuetz YB, Naik A, Guy RH, et al. Emerging strategies for the transdermal delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:533–548.

https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.533

Agu RU, Ugwoke MI, Armand M, et al. The lung as a route for systemic delivery of therapeutic proteins and peptides. Respir. Res. 2001;2:198–209.

https://doi.org/10.1186/rr58

Bosquillon C, Préat V, Vanbever R. Pulmonary delivery of growth hormone using dry powders and visualization of its local fate in rats. J. Control. Release. 2004;96:233–244.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.027

Ghilzai NMK, Desai A. Facing the challenges of transmucosal absorption—buccal, nasal and rectal routes, Pharma Tech 2004, Business Briefing World Market Series, London, 2004, pp. 104–106.

Florence AT, Attwood D. Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 2006.

Cleland JL, Langer R. Formulation and delivery of proteins and peptides: design and development strategies, in: J.L. Cleland, R. Langer (Eds.), Formulation and Delivery of Proteins and Peptides, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1994, pp. 1–19.

https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1994-0567.ch001

Metselaar JM, Mastrobattista E, Storm G. Liposomes for intravenous drug targeting: design and applications. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2002;4:319–329.

https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557023405873

Gombotz WR, Pettit DK. Biodegradable polymers for protein and peptide drug delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 1995;6:332–351.

https://doi.org/10.1021/bc00034a002

Packhaeuser CB, Schnieders J, Oster CG, et al. In situ forming parenteral drug delivery systems: an overview. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2004;58:445–455.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.003

Kompella UB, Lee VHL. Delivery systems for penetration enhancement of peptide and protein drugs: design considerations, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;46:211–245.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00137-x

Prego C, Torres D, Alonso MJ. The potential of chitosan for the oral administration of peptides. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:843–854.

https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.5.843

Ugwoke MI, Agu RU, Verbeke N, et al. Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: background, applications, trends and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:1640–1665.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.009

Alpar HO, Somavarapu S, Atuah KN, et al. Biodegradable mucoadhesive particulates for nasal and pulmonary antigen and DNA delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:411–430.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.09.004

Schuetz YB, Naik A, Guy RH, et al. Emerging strategies for the transdermal delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:533–548.

https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.533

Langer R. Where a pill won't reach. Sci Am. 2003;288:50–57.

https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0403-50

Myles ME, Neumann DM, Hill JM. Recent progress in ocular drug delivery for posterior segment disease: emphasis on transscleral iontophoresis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:2063–2079.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.08.006

Smart JD. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:507–517.

https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2.3.507

Choonara BF, Choonara YE, Kumar P, et al. A review of advanced oral drug delivery technologies facilitating the protection and absorption of protein and peptide molecules. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:1269-82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.006

Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J. Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: the gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:557-70.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.009

des Rieux A, Fievez V, Garinot M, et al. Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach. J Control Release. 2006;116(1):1-27.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013

Prego C, Torres D, Fernandez-Megia E, et al. Chitosan–PEG nanocapsules as new carriers for oral peptide delivery: effect of chitosan pegylation degree. J Control Release. 2006;111(3):299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.015

Amidon GL, Lennernaes H, Shah VP, et al. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995;12:413–20.

https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016212804288

Lipinski CA. Avoiding investment in doomed drugs—is solubility an industry wide Acceproblem? Curr Drug Discov. 2001;1:17–9.

Murakami T, Takano M. Intestinal efflux transporters and drug absorption. Exp Op Drug Met Tox. 2008;4:923–39.

https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.4.7.923.

Uekama K, Hirayama F, Irie T. Cyclodextrin drug carrier systems. Chem Rev. 1998;98:2045–2076.

https://doi.org/10.1021/cr970025p

Report: Biotechnology Medicines in Development, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, Washington DC, 2019.

Hillery AM. Drug delivery, the basic concepts, in: A.M. Hillery, A.W. Lloyd, J. Swarbrick (Eds.), Drug Delivery and Targeting for Pharmacists and Pharmaceutical Scientists, Taylor & Francis, London, 2001, pp. 1–48.

Frokjaer S, Otzen DE. Protein drug stability: a formulation challenge. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):298-306.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1695

Banga AK. Drug delivery today, Pharma Tech 2002, Business Briefing World Market Series, London, 2002, pp. 150–154.

Crommelin D, van Winden E, Mekking A. Delivery of pharmaceutical proteins, in: M.E. Aulton (Ed.), Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Forms Design, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 2001, pp. 544–553.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00152-0

Mehrdadi S. Acute Bacterial Meningitis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention. J Arch Mil Med. Online ahead of Print ; 6(4):e84749.

https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm.84749.

Mehrdadi S. Drug delivery of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) to target brain tumors. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin.

https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2023.062

Tsomaia N. Peptide therapeutics: targeting the undruggable space. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;94:459-70.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.014

Global Data 2015.

http://www.globaldata.com. 2015.

Tomita M, Shiga M, Hayashi M, et al. Enhancement of colonic drug absorption by the paracellular permeation route. Pharm Res. 1988;5(12):786-9.

https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015992819290

Pappenheimer JR. Physiological regulation of transepithelial impedance in the intestinal mucosa of rats and hamsters. J Membr Biol. 1987;100:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209146

Tang VW, Goodenough DA. Paracellular ion channel at the tight junction. Biophys J. 2003;84(3): 1660–1673.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74975-3.

Florence AT. Issues in oral nanoparticle drug carrier uptake and targeting. J Drug Target. 2004;12:65–70.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860410001693706

Burton PS, Conradi RA, Hilgers AR. (B) Mechanisms of peptide and protein absorption: (2) transcellular mechanism of peptide and protein absorption: passive aspects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1991;7:365–385.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409X(91)90014-

Giannasca PJ, Giannasca KT, Leichtner AM, et al. Human intestinal M cells display the sialyl Lewis A antigen. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:946–953.

https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.67.2.946-953.1999.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

Adil, A., Muhammad, F., Ishtiaq, Q., Rashid, S., & Rashid, H. (2025). Retracted. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1255