Effect of Immune-Modulating Interventions on Trained Immunity and Disease Resistance Against Avian Influenza in Commercial Poultry: A Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Syed Ali Shuja Department of Pathology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Usman Department of Poultry Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Constituent College, Toba Tek Singh, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Waqar Younis Riphah International University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Saba Iftikhar Department of Biological Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Faisal Ali Samoon Department of Poultry Husbandry, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Maqsood Ahmad Poultry Research Institute Rawalpindi, Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Sahar Hafeez Department of Poultry Husbandry, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Mehtab Chohan Department of Poultry Husbandry, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Aniq Nazar Departemnt of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Maryam Iqbal Department of Biochemistry, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (AWKUM), KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1220

Keywords:

Trained Immunity, Poultry Health, Disease Prevention, Immune-modulating Interventions, Avian Influenza, Macrophage Activation, Cytokine Production

Abstract

This study examined the potential of trained immunity to improve disease resistance in chickens, by explicitly focusing on avian influenza. Trained immunity describes the capacity of the innate immune system to demonstrate memory, which leads to augmented responses to repeated infections. This study aimed to assess whether immunomodulatory therapies, including vaccination and microbiome supplementation, could enhance trained immunity and bolster immunological responses in chickens, considering the challenges presented by infectious illnesses in poultry production. A controlled experiment was performed at University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan, using 100 chickens segregated into two groups: a treatment group that received immunomodulatory interventions and a control group that did not. Blood and tissue specimens were obtained at baseline and 1, 2, and 4 weeks after the intervention to assess cytokine production (IL-6), macrophage activation, and pathogen resistance. Statistical techniques, such as repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square testing, were used to assess the groups' immune responses and infection rates. These findings indicated that the treatment group displayed markedly elevated levels of IL-6 and enhanced macrophage activation relative to the control group. The treatment group exhibited a 30% decrease in avian influenza infection rate, underscoring the efficacy of trained immunity in bolstering disease resistance. These data indicate that trained immunity may effectively enhance immune responses and decrease pathogen susceptibility in chickens, thereby presenting a viable alternative to conventional disease management methods. These results highlight the necessity for additional research to investigate the long-term implications of trained immunity in chickens and their relevance to other infectious illnesses. This study provides significant insights into chicken health management, and establishes a foundation for future studies to enhance and broaden the application of trained immunity in poultry farming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abah, H., Abdu, P., & Assam, A. (2017). Assessment of biosecurity measures against Newcastle disease in commercial poultry farms in Benue state, Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 15(3), 32.

https://doi.org/10.4314/sokjvs.v15i3.5

Adams, J. R., Mehat, J., La Ragione, R., & Behboudi, S. (2023). Preventing bacterial disease in poultry in the post-antibiotic era: A case for innate immunity modulation as an alternative to antibiotic use. Frontiers in Immunology, 14.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1205869

Bar-Dagan, H., Gover, O., Cohen, N. A., Vetvicka, V., Rozenboim, I., & Schwartz, B. (2023). Beta-glucans induce cellular immune training and changes in intestinal morphology in poultry. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1092812

Dagenais, A., Villalba-Guerrero, C., & Olivier, M. (2023). Trained immunity: A “new” weapon in the fight against infectious diseases. Frontiers in Immunology, 14.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1147476

Domínguez-Andrés, J., Joosten, L. A., & Netea, M. G. (2019). Induction of innate immune memory: The role of cellular metabolism. Current Opinion in Immunology, 56, 10-16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2018.09.001

Dong, W., Zhang, H., Huang, H., Zhou, J., Hu, L., Lian, A., Zhu, L., Ma, N., Yang, P., Wei, K., & Zhu, R. (2016). Chicken IgY Fc linked to Bordetella avium ompA and Taishan Pinus massoniana pollen polysaccharide adjuvant enhances macrophage function and specific immune responses. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01708

Kleinnijenhuis, J., Quintin, J., Preijers, F., Joosten, L. A., Ifrim, D. C., Saeed, S., Jacobs, C., Van Loenhout, J., De Jong, D., Stunnenberg, H. G., Xavier, R. J., Van der Meer, J. W., Van Crevel, R., & Netea, M. G. (2012). Bacille Calmette-Guerin induces NOD2-dependent nonspecific protection from reinfection via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(43), 17537-17542.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202870109

Netea, M. G. (2013). Training innate immunity: The changing concept of immunological memory in innate host defence. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 43(8), 881-884.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12132

Netea, M. G., Domínguez-Andrés, J., Barreiro, L. B., Chavakis, T., Divangahi, M., Fuchs, E., Joosten, L. A., Van der Meer, J. W., Mhlanga, M. M., Mulder, W. J., Riksen, N. P., Schlitzer, A., Schultze, J. L., Stabell Benn, C., Sun, J. C., Xavier, R. J., & Latz, E. (2020). Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology, 20(6), 375-388.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0285-6

Ochando, J., Mulder, W. J., Madsen, J. C., Netea, M. G., & Duivenvoorden, R. (2022). Trained immunity — basic concepts and contributions to immunopathology. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 19(1), 23-37.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-022-00633-5

Penha Filho, R. A., Zancan, F. T., Almeida, A. M., & Berchieri Junior, A. (2018). Protection of chickens against fowl typhoid using field vaccine programs formulated with the live attenuated strain Salmonella Gallinarum ΔcobSΔcbiA. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 84(0).

https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000272015

Saz-Leal, P., Del Fresno, C., Brandi, P., Martínez-Cano, S., Dungan, O. M., Chisholm, J. D., Kerr, W. G., & Sancho, D. (2018). Targeting SHIP-1 in myeloid cells enhances trained immunity and boosts response to infection. Cell Reports, 25(5), 1118-1126.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.092

Silva, A. P., & Gallardo, R. A. (2020). The chicken MHC: Insights into genetic resistance, immunity, and inflammation following infectious bronchitis virus infections. Vaccines, 8(4), 637.

https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040637

Verwoolde, M. B., Van den Biggelaar, R. H., Van Baal, J., Jansen, C. A., & Lammers, A. (2020). Training of primary chicken monocytes results in enhanced pro-inflammatory responses. Veterinary Sciences, 7(3), 115.

https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7030115

Yoshimura, Y., Nii, T., & Isobe, N. (2024). Innate immune training in chickens for improved defense against pathogens: A review. The Journal of Poultry Science, 61(0), n/a.

https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.2024008

Downloads

Published

2025-05-07

How to Cite

Shuja, S. A., Usman, M., Younis, W., Iftikhar, S., Samoon, F. A., Ahmad, M., Hafeez, S., Chohan, M., Nazar, M. A., & Iqbal, M. (2025). Effect of Immune-Modulating Interventions on Trained Immunity and Disease Resistance Against Avian Influenza in Commercial Poultry: A Controlled Trial. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1220