Indications of Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Zehra Somjee Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Pooja Seetlani Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Civil Hospital Makli, Thatta, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Mahrukh Aslam Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Indus Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Shaista Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, United Medical & Dental College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1171

Keywords:

Hysterectomy, Benign Gynecologic Conditions, Preoperative Diagnoses

Abstract

Objective: To identify the indications and acute complications of hysterectomy performed for benign gynecologic conditions in a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Descriptive Longitudinal Study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit 1, Civil Hospital Karachi in the duration from 24 November, 2024 to 23 March, 2025. Methodology: Data was collected from women aged 18–65 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions. Demographic details, preoperative diagnoses, intra-operative findings, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcome was the frequency of indications, while secondary outcomes focused on complications. SPSS Version 22 was used for statistical analysis, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant. Results: Common indications included uterine fibroids in 105 cases (53.6%), adenomyosis in 40 (20.4%) patients and uterine prolapse in 30 patients (15%). Complications such as wound infections (14 patients, 7%), hemorrhage (10 patients 5%), and burst abdomen (2 patients, 1%) were observed.  Conclusion: Understanding indications and outcomes of hysterectomy can guide better clinical practices and improve patient safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wu, J. M., Wechter, M. E., Geller, E. J., Nguyen, T. V., & Visco, A. G. (2007). Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110(5), 1091-1095.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000285997.38553.4b

Hymavathi, K., Madhuri, P. V., Brahmini, M., & Madhubala, S. (2021). Hysterectomy for benign conditions in a tertiary care centre: A clinical audit. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10(3), 975.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210719

Majeed, T., Adnan, R., & Mahmood, Z. (2016). Audit of gynaecological hysterectomies. Pak J Med Health Sci, 7(3), 684-7.

https://pjmhsonline.com/2013/july_sep/pdf/684%20%20%20Audit%20of%20Gynaecological%20Hysterectomies.pdf

Shaikh, A. G., & Shaikh, S. N. (2018). Abdominal hysterectomy for benign diseases. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International), 23, 3.

https://www.old.jsp.org.pk/Issues/JSP%2023%20(3)%20July%20-%20Sep%202018/Aneela%20Gul%20Shaikh%20OA.pdf

Chale, G. J., Salim, R. M., & Leshabari, K. M. (2021). Clinical indications for total abdominal hysterectomy among women seen in Dar es Salaam regional referral hospitals, Tanzania: a prospective, observational hospital-based study. Pan African Medical Journal, 38(1).

https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.38.10.17695

Sait, K., Alkhattabi, M., Boker, A., & Alhashemi, J. (2008). Hysterectomy for benign conditions in a university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 28(4), 282.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.51699

Pandey, D., Sehgal, K., Saxena, A., Hebbar, S., Nambiar, J., & Bhat, R. G. (2014). An audit of indications, complications, and justification of hysterectomies at a teaching hospital in India. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2014, 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/279273

Hymavathi, K., Madhuri, P. V., Brahmini, M., & Madhubala, S. (2021). Hysterectomy for benign conditions in a tertiary care centre: A clinical audit. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10(3), 975.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210719

Manandhar, T., Sitaula, S., Thapa, B. D., Agrawal, A., & Thakur, A. (2020). Prevalence of hysterectomy among Gynecological surgeries in a tertiary care hospital. Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 58(232). https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5315

Munro, M. G., Critchley, H. O., Broder, M. S., & Fraser, I. S. (2011). FIGO classification system (PALM‐COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 113(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011

Ali Algadiem, E., Aleisa, A. A., Alsubaie, H. I., Buhlaiqah, N. R., Algadeeb, J. B., & Alsneini, H. A. (2016). Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Monthly, 21(2).

https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.34131

Liu, Z., Doan, Q. V., Blumenthal, P., & Dubois, R. W. (2007). A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding. Value in Health, 10(3), 183-194.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00168.x

Chen, B., Ren, D., Li, J., & Li, C. (2014). Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective non-randomized trial. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 30(4).

https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4436

Downloads

Published

2025-05-06

How to Cite

Somjee, Z., Seetlani, P., Aslam, M., & Shaista. (2025). Indications of Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1171