Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Compared with Milligan-Morgan Excision for the Treatment of Prolapsing Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Study

Authors

  • Muhammad Usman Azhar Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Abdullah Umer Department of Internal Medicine, CMH, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Ahmed Salman Majeed Department of Surgery, THQ Hospital, Pattoki, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Hamza Department of General Surgery, Muzaffarabad General Hospital, Muzaffarabad, AJK, Pakistan.
  • Kanwal Saeed Department of Anatomy, PGMI, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Ali Nasir Department of Internal Medicine, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute Filter Clinic, Sheikhupura, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Bilal Qammar Department of Internal Medicine, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v2i02.257

Keywords:

Prolapsing Haemorrhoids, Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy, Milligan-Morgan Excision

Abstract

Background: Haemorrhoids, a common rectal and anal pathology, present with symptoms such as pain, bleeding, and prolapse caused by oedematous vascular formations in the anal canal. The conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (MMH) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy, PPH) are frequently used surgical techniques for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Aim: To compare Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy and Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy in treating prolapsing haemorrhoids. Methodology: This prospective comparative cross-sectional study analyzed early postoperative outcomes in 60 patients undergoing either PPH or MMH. The study was conducted at Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Data were collected for six months’ duration from January 2024 to June 2024 using a Likert scale questionnaire adapted from Khan et al. (2009). Descriptive statistics summarized continuous variables like operative time, VAS pain scores, and hospital stay, while categorical variables were analyzed using frequency distributions and the Chi-square test to assess associations between complications and procedure type. Findings and Conclusion: Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy showed significant advantages over MMH, including shorter operative time, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays. It was also associated with fewer complications such as postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, infection, and anal stenosis. These findings align with previous studies, confirming that Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy offers better recovery and lower complication rates, making it a preferred option in healthcare settings

References

Kibret, A. A., Oumer, M., & Moges, A. M. (2021). Prevalence and associated factors of hemorrhoids among adult patients visiting the surgical outpatient department in the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0249736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249736

Bhuiyan, M. J. H., Yahia, A., Begum, F., Ahmed, M., & Ahmed, N. I. U. (2020). Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy in the Treatment of Haemorrhoidal Disease: A Prospective Study. Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons, 38(3), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v38i3.47060

Qureshi, R. N., Sheikh, S., Khowaja, A. R., Hoodbhoy, Z., Zaidi, S., Sawchuck, D., Vidler, M., Bhutta, Z. A., & von Dadeslzen, P. (2016). Health care seeking behaviours in pregnancy in rural Sindh, Pakistan: a qualitative study. Reproductive Health, 13(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0140-1

Kehlet, H. (2018). Postoperative pain, analgesia, and recovery—bedfellows that cannot be ignored. PAIN, 159, S11–S16. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001243

Iqbal, Z., Amin, A., Ahmad, Z. S., & Khan, M. (2016). Comparison of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy (A randomized control trial in Hayatabad Medical Complex). Ophthalmology Update, 14(1).

Yardimci, V. H. (2021). Less postoperative pain and more frequent recurrence: Can this dilemma caused by the stapled haemorrhoidopexy procedure be avoided? International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14981

Ruan, Q. Z., English, W., Hotouras, A., Bryant, C., Taylor, F., Andreani, S., Wexner, S. D., & Banerjee, S. (2020). A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Techniques in Coloproctology, 25(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02314-6

Pheto, P. (2018). An audit of uterotonic use for the prophylaxis and treatment of haemorrhage at caesarean delivery at Mowbray Maternity Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29673

Khan, N. F., Hussain Shah, S. S., Bokhari, I., Mahboob, S., Gulfam, M. A., & Ghayasuddin, M. (2009). Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan Morgan's haemorrhoidectomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 19(9), 561-5. https://jcpsp.pk/archive/2009/Sep2009/07.pdf

Yuh, B. E., Nazmy, M., Ruel, N. H., Jankowski, J. T., Menchaca, A. R., Torrey, R. R., Linehan, J. A., Lau, C. S., Chan, K. G., & Wilson, T. G. (2012). Standardized Analysis of Frequency and Severity of Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy. European Urology, 62(5), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.007

Infantino, A., Altomare, D. F., Bottini, C., Bonanno, M., & Mancini, S. (2012). Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Disease, 14(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02628.x

Ahmad Khan, A., Mahar, T., Adnan, M. K., Surahio, A. R., Manan, A., & Ahmad, I. (2020). Postoperative recovery; Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy versus Conventional haemorrhoidectomy. The Professional Medical Journal, 27(01), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2019.27.01.4098

Gan, T. J. (2017). Poorly controlled postoperative pain: Prevalence, consequences, and prevention. Journal of Pain Research, 10(1), 2287–2298. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s144066

Bakhtiar, N., Moosa, F. A., Jaleel, F., Qureshi, N. A., & Jawaid, M. (2016). Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan’s hemorrhoidectomy. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9976

Bakhtiar, N., Moosa, F. A., Jaleel, F., Qureshi, N. A., & Jawaid, M. (2016). Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan’s hemorrhoidectomy. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9976

Chik, B., Law, W. L., & Choi, H. K. (2006). Urinary Retention After Haemorrhoidectomy: Impact of Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy. Asian Journal of Surgery, 29(4), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1015-9584(09)60094-4

Krishnan, R., MacNeil, S. D., & Malvankar-Mehta, M. S. (2016). Comparing sutures versus staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 6(1), e009257. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009257

Gallo, G., Martellucci, J., Sturiale, A., Clerico, G., Milito, G., Marino, F., Cocorullo, G., Giordano, P., Mistrangelo, M., & Trompetto, M. (2020). Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Techniques in Coloproctology, 24(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02149-1

Birkmeyer, J. D., Finks, J. F., O’Reilly, A., Oerline, M., Carlin, A. M., Nunn, A. R., Dimick, J., Banerjee, M., & Birkmeyer, N. J. O. (2013). Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(15), 1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1300625

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

How to Cite

Azhar, M. U., Umer, A., Salman Majeed, A., Muhammad Hamza, Saeed, K., Nasir, A., & Qammar, B. (2024). Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Compared with Milligan-Morgan Excision for the Treatment of Prolapsing Haemorrhoids: A Prospective Study. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 2(02), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v2i02.257

Most read articles by the same author(s)