Assessing UGFS+SFL as an Alternative to Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins: Outcomes, Safety, and Economic Implications: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v2i02.186Keywords:
Sapheno-Femoral Ligation, Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy, Varicose Veins, Cost-Effectiveness, Complications, Vein ObliterationAbstract
Objective: The aims of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy related with the sapheno-femoral ligation (UGFS+SFL) versus conventional surgical treatment for the varicose veins.
Methods: This study was conducted over a period of 18 months. Minimum of 80 patients with primary varicose vein due to SFJ (saphenofemoral junction) incompetence were selected and randomly assigned in each arm i.e. surgical and foam sclerotherapy.
Results: Both of UGFS+SFL and the conventional surgery led to the significant improvements in CEAP and the VCSS scores. UGFS+SFL group showed the greater reduction in VCSS scores post-treatment compared to surgical group. The Early complications were fewer in UGFS+SFL group, which had no cases of deep the vein thrombosis (DVT) or saphenous nerve injury, the unlike surgical group. Cost of UGFS+SFL was Rs.255924, the significantly lower than Rs.425644 for conventional surgery. The Ultrasound follow-up revealed high rates of vein obliteration in the both groups, though UGFS+SFL group had slightly the lower rates of full obliteration at 3 months.
Conclusion: The UGFS+SFL is an effective and the cost-effective alternative to conventional surgery for treating the varicose veins. It offers the comparable clinical outcomes with fewer complications and the lower costs. These treatments achieve high rates of the vein obliteration, making UGFS+SFL a viable option for patients seeking the less invasive approach
References
Sassaki, V.S. and E. Fukaya, Varicose veins: approach, assessment, and management to the patient with chronic venous disease. Medical Clinics, 2023. 107(5): p. 895-909.
Wąs, M., et al., Treatment Methods for Varicose Veins of the Lower Limbs. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 2024. 74: p. 52561-52561.
Davies, H.O., et al., A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Phlebology, 2016. 31(4): p. 234-240.
Epstein, D., et al., Cost-effectiveness analysis of current varicose veins treatments. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, 2022. 10(2): p. 504-513. e7.
Wallace, T., Optimising Outcomes in the Treatment of Superficial Venous Insufficiency. 2014, University of Hull and the University of York.
De Maeseneer, M., et al., Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins of the lower limbs after treatment for varicose veins–UIP consensus document. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2011. 42(1): p. 89-102.
Kotoed, S., et al., Causes of need of reoperation following surgery for varicose veins in Dennmark. Ugeskr Laeger, 1999. 8: p. 779-783.
McNamara, S.A., et al., Venous Procedures to Treat Venous Leg Ulcers. Current Dermatology Reports, 2020. 9: p. 277-285.
MacKenzie, R., et al., The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on deep venous reflux. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2004. 28(1): p. 104-107.
Debus, E.S., et al., Varicose Veins. 2017, Springer.
Gohel, M. and D. Maeseneer, Five-year data find foam sclerotherapy to be less effective than thermoablation or stripping for varicose veins.
Brar, R., et al., Surgical management of varicose veins: meta-analysis. Vascular, 2010. 18(4): p. 205-220.
Neglen, P., Long saphenous stripping is favored in treating varicose veins. Dermatologic surgery, 2001. 27(10): p. 901-902.
Bountouroglou, D., et al., Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a randomised controlled trial. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2006. 31(1): p. 93-100.
Frullini, A. and A. Cavezzi, Sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins and telangiectases: history and analysis of safety and complications. Dermatologic surgery, 2002. 28(1): p. 11-15.
Vitiello, V., et al., Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 2012. 6: p. 111-126.
Hsu, T.-S. and R.A. Weiss, Foam sclerotherapy: a new era. Archives of dermatology, 2003. 139(11): p. 1494-1496.
Wollmann, J.-C.G., The history of sclerosing foams. Dermatologic surgery, 2004. 30(5): p. 694-703.
Moawed, M.M., FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY WITH SAPHENOFEMORAL LIGATION COMPARED TO STANDARD SURGERY FOR VARICOSE VEINS. Al-Azhar Med. J, 2013. 42: p. 3.
Rutherford, R.B., et al., Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. Journal of vascular surgery, 2000. 31(6): p. 1307-1312.
Cavezzi, A., A new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins: Tessari method. Minerva Cardioangiol, 2000. 48(Suppl 1): p. 248.
Farah, M.H., et al., A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. Journal of vascular surgery: venous and lymphatic disorders, 2022. 10(5): p. 1155-1171.
Xu, J., et al., Comparison of day surgery between varicose veins with and without superficial venous thrombosis below knee: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2023. 23(1): p. 387.
Beaubien-Souligny, W., et al., Quantifying systemic congestion with Point-Of-Care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. The ultrasound journal, 2020. 12: p. 1-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
