Morphological and Variability Assessment of (F7) Wheat Lines Under Normal and Rainfed Conditions
Keywords:
Wheat, Irrigated condition, Drought, GenotypeAbstract
A field trial was performed to identify the potential genotypes in 100 wheat lines (96 F7 fixed lines and 4 controls) for yield and yield-associated traits in an augmented design under irrigated and rainfed conditions. These lines/genotypes were analyzed for days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, grain per spike, thousand-grain weight and grain yield. The wheat genotypes showed a significant G×E for all the traits across irrigated and rainfed conditions. The evaluation of variances revealed significant differences among the wheat genotypes for the evaluated morphological traits. According to the findings of the present experiment genotype, the CCRIG7-82 showed the best performance in grain yield under normal conditions. However, wheat lines CCRIG7-1 surpassed all other genotypes in grain yield under rainfed conditions. Furthermore, wheat genotypes CCRIG7-1 showed stability of the traits i.e. days to maturity in both environments i.e. (irrigated and rainfed conditions). Different drought tolerance indices were evaluated for grain yield under rainfed (Ys) and irrigated (Yp) conditions. The stress tolerance (TOL) index identified CCR1G7-82 (8100 Kg ha-1), as the most tolerant, whereas, based on mean productivity, CCR1G7-59 and CCR1G7-60 (5900 Kg ha-1), were tolerant. Similarly, the geometric mean productivity (GMP) identified genotypes CCR1G7-60 (5246 Kg ha-1), as the best tolerant. In the same way, CCR1G7-85 (4716 Kg ha-1) were identified as tolerant genotypes based on harmonic mean (HM). Stress susceptibility index (SSI), grouped genotypes CCR1G7-64 (0.07), were stress tolerant. Stress tolerance index (STI) clustered genotypes CCR1G7-60 (5.87), as the most tolerant, while yield index (YI) ranked genotypes CCR1G7-76, CCR1G7-85 (1.71), as the most tolerant. The yield stability index (YSI) desirable genotypes were CCR1G7-64 (0.90) and were noted as drought tolerance genotypes in stressed conditions
References
Wani SH, Sheikh F, Najeeb S, Iqbal AM, Kordrostami M, Parray G, Jeberson MS. Genetic variability study in bread wheat 12. (Triticum aestivum L.) under temperate conditions. Current Agriculture Research Journal. 2018;6(3):268.
Irshad, M., Ullah, F., Fahad, S., Mehmood, S., Khan, A.U., Brtnicky, M., Kintl, A., Holatko, J., Irshad, I., El-Sharnouby, M. and El Sabagh, A., 2021. Evaluation of Jatropha curcas L. leaves mulching on wheat growth and biochemical attributes under water stress. BMC Plant Biology, 21(1), pp.1-12. Giraldo, P., Benavente, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F. and Gimenez, E., 2019. Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: A bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy, 9(7), p.352.
Government of Pakistan., 2017. Economic survey of Pakistan.
Ali, A., Ali, N., Ullah, N., Ullah, F., Adnan, M. and Ahmed, Z., 2013. Research article effect of drought stress on the physiology and yield of the pakistani wheat germplasms.
EL Sabagh, A., Islam, M.S., Skalicky, M., Ali Raza, M., Singh, K., Anwar Hossain, M., Hossain, A., Mahboob, W., Iqbal, M.A., Ratnasekera, D. and Singhal, R.K., 2021. Salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the changing climate: Adaptation and management strategies. Frontiers in Agronomy, 3, p.661932.
Ashraf A, El-Mohsen A, Abd El-Shafi MA, Gheith EMS, Suleiman HS. 2015. Using Different Statistical Procedures for Evaluating Drought Tolerance Indices of Bread Wheat Genotypes. Adv. Agri. and Biol., 4 (1), 19-30.
Raza, A., Charagh, S., Sadaqat, N. and Jin, W., 2020. Arabidopsis thaliana: Model plant for the study of abiotic stress responses. The Plant Family Brassicaceae: Biology and Physiological Responses to Environmental Stresses, pp.129-180.
Rahman, M.A., Kabir, M.L., Hasanuzzaman, M., Rahman, M.A., Rumi, R.H. and Afrose, M.T., 2016. Study of variability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 8(5), pp.66-76
; Siyal, A.L., Siyal, F.K. and Jatt, T., 2021. 28. Yield from genetic variability of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under water stress condition: A case study of Tandojam, Sindh. Pure and Applied Biology (PAB), 10(3), pp.841-860.
Ahmad, H.M., Ahsan, M., Ali, Q. and Javed, I., 2012. Genetic variability, heritability and correlation studies of various quantitative traits of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) at different radiation levels. International Research Journal of Microbiology, 3(11), pp.352-362.
Abbas, G., Ali, M.A., Abbas, G., Azam, M. and Hussain, I., 2009. Impact of planting methods on wheat grain yield and yield contributing parameters. J. Anim. Plant Sci, 19(1), pp.30-33.
Dai, J., Bean, B., Brown, B., Bruening, W., Edwards, J., Flowers, M., Karow, R., Lee, C., Morgan, G., Ottman, M. and Ransom, J., 2016. Harvest index and straw yield of five classes of wheat. Biomass and Bioenergy, 85, pp.223-227.
Ijaz, F., Khaliq, I. and Shahzad, M.T., 2015. Estimation of heritability for some yield contributing traits in F2 populations of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Agric. Res, 53(2), pp.157-164.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.